Reuters reports: Children in Europe are aware of the risks of illegal downloading but often rationalize their act by saying that everyone - including their parents - is doing it, according to a major European Commission survey. Other excuses included: the download is for personal and private purposes; the Web sites presumably remunerate the artists… Almost all of the children surveyed in the 27 European Union member countries, as well as in Norway and Iceland, said they expect to continue downloading.
A Major European Commission survey…
By Adi Blum
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
One Response to “A Major European Commission survey…”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
-
-
get involved
-
- 4.08.10 Amazon: Deal with Andrew Wiley, Literary Agent
Andrew Wiley, representing literary heavyweights like Salman Rushdie, Philip Roth, both alive, and among
No comments yet - 13.07.10 Copyleft is not a danger for authors but a freedom, Lessig clarifies
We have not reported on the latest ASCAP scam, their money raising campaign for the "Legislative Fund
One comment - 10.07.10 Once Again RIAA Suffers Massive Setback – this Time the Tenenbaum Case
With a little bit of schadenfreude we report, that the RIAA once again missed its business goals by a
No comments yet
- 4.08.10 Amazon: Deal with Andrew Wiley, Literary Agent
-
- Subscribe to RSS
- Subscribe to the Newsletter
- Recommend this site to a friend


This is sort of congruent with the findings of WIPO we reported earlier. I am left wondering — are these kids “rationaliz[ing] their act[s]” as the IP industry wants us to believe — or should we think more fundamentally differently about downloading and accept the new cultural behaviour of online sharing as righteous and legal and fix the copyright legislation accordingly (you’ll have guessed my opinion by now). Some scholars think that the Internet is a medieval medium from before the invention of the printing press[1]. This does indeed justify rethinking legislation to suit current practice — and not the other way round, make current practice impractical by legislating.
[1] Egbert Dommering (2004). Lessen uit de geschiedenis van het auteursrecht, p. 16